/
competitor

Skydive vs Viktor

Skydive gives you a whole team of AI agents that do real work in the tools you already use.

Get started→

How Skydive compares to Viktor

Skydive lets you build a workforce of focused agents, each owning a job with its own memory, permissions, and presence across web, Slack, email, and text.

10 reasons teams pick Skydive
Skydive
Viktor
A team of agents, not one shared employee
y
n
Each agent has its own identity
y
n
Web, Slack, email, and iMessage
y
n
Own cloud computer and real browser
y
y
Live browser handoff for logins
y
n
Reaches your own computer via Portal
y
n
Its own GitHub identity for PRs
y
n
Agents hand off work to each other
y
n
Pick the model per agent
y
y
Unlimited agents, no per-seat fee
y
n
Pick Skydive if you...
Want a team of specialist agents with clear owners, not one shared employee
Need each agent to have its own identity, memory, and permissions
Want reach across email and text, not just Slack and Teams
Want live browser handoff and access to your own machine
Pick Viktor if you...
You want one shared AI employee for the whole company, not agents with clear owners
Almost all your work happens in Slack or Microsoft Teams
You prefer one shared context and one shared pool of credits
Your priority is a very large managed connector count for your exact tools
Comparison based on publicly available product information reviewed July 2026.
FAQ

What is the core difference between Skydive and Viktor?

Viktor is one AI employee shared by your whole workspace, with shared context and shared credits. Skydive lets you build multiple named specialists, each with its own identity, memory, cloud computer, tools, and channels, that can delegate to and collaborate with each other. Viktor is simpler to roll out; Skydive gives work clear owners.

Which one has more integrations?

Viktor claims the larger turnkey catalog: 27 native integrations plus 3,200 or more managed connectors. Skydive documents 79 one-click integrations and extends through OAuth, API keys, MCP, a real browser, and custom code. If a very large connector count for your exact tools is the deciding factor, check both catalogs against your stack; Skydive reaches the long tail through OAuth, API keys, MCP, a real browser, and custom code.

Why run several agents instead of one shared employee?

Different jobs need different context, access, and identity. A support agent should learn support policy; a finance agent should reach financial systems; an engineering agent should work in code. Skydive keeps each role focused with its own memory and permissions, then lets agents hand off to each other when a task crosses teams.

Is switching from Viktor to Skydive a lot of work?

There is no workflow to rebuild. You describe the outcome you want, connect the tools the agent needs once, and it starts working. You do recreate any instructions, skills, and schedules you rely on, since no automated migration is published between the two.

Can my agent work across my tools and run code?

Yes. Viktor is a serious platform, not a chatbot: it runs in a real cloud Linux environment, executes code, drives a browser, builds hosted apps, and connects to a large catalog it describes as 27 native integrations plus 3,200 or more managed connectors. Skydive also does these, and adds a distinct identity per agent, live browser handoff, and reach into your own computer.

Is my data safe with Skydive?

Each agent runs in its own isolated sandbox, and credentials are injected through a network proxy so raw tokens stay out of prompts, logs, and memory. Access is scoped per service and revocable. Skydive is currently in beta; security and compliance details are available on request.